The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Euro-politics: institutions and policymaking in the new European community
Abstract
Europe 1992, the market integration of the twelve European Community (EC) member states, has attracted widespread attention as an economic project of enormous importance. But though journalists and scholars have focused much attention on the economic aspects of Europe 1992, the program's impact on the governance of the EC has been largely ignoredeven though the creation of a single market is intimately linked to changes in With each member state having a very different institutional structure, the variation within the EC is far greater than that found in federations such as the United States. Though this variety adds to the complexity of consensus building among the members, it allows effective representation of diverse national interests and needs, thus making the EC a very strong, competitive force. To negotiate effectively with this Community, international policymakers will need a greater understanding of how the EC will operate in the wake of the Maastricht Summit. Euro-Politics examines various aspects of the institutional dynamics of the EC and offers important insight into policy making within the Community. David Cameron discusses the origin of the 1992 program and examines the role of the nation-state in the Community. Guy Peters surveys the political and executive institutions, while Martin Shapiro discusses the European Court of Justice and the evolution of judicial review within the Community. John Woolley examines the European Monetary System and the movement toward the EuroFed, Gary Marks studies the importance of the Regional Funds for both the EC and selected member states, and Peter Lange discusses the Social Charter and its implications for both employers and unions. Alberta Sbragia concludes with an analysis of institutional dynamics and policymaking with the Community in light of the new questions they raise for traditional notions of governance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis
PIERSON, P. (1996) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414096029002001 · Cited by 1,634
European Integration from the 1980s: State‐Centric v. Multi‐level Governance*
Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00577.x · Cited by 1,543
Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration
Burley, A.-M., & Mattli, W. (1993) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300004707 · Cited by 1,376
Decision‐making in the European Union: Towards a framework for analysis
Peterson, J. (1995) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501769508406975 · Cited by 521
Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union
Jupille, J., Caporaso, J. A., & Checkel, J. T. (2003) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414002239370 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1992-10-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 30-1166-30-1166
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2060133541
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Euro-politics: institutions and policymaking in the new European community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-1166
- The paper
- Euro-politics: institutions and policymaking in the new European community. (1992). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-1166
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.