The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Colonial situations: essays on the contextualization of ethnographic knowledge
Abstract
The relation of anthropology to colonialism and became a burning issue for anthropologists in mid-1960s. As European colonies in Asia and Africa became independent nations, as United States engaged in war in South-east Asia and in covert operations in South America, anthropologists questioned their interactions with their subjects and worried about political consequences of government-supported research. By 1970, some spoke of anthropology as the child of Western imperialism and as scientific colonialism. Ironically, as link between anthropology and colonialism became more widely accepted within discipline, serious interest diminished in examining history of anthropology in contexts. This volume attempts a critical historical consideration of varying in which (and from which) ethnographic knowledge essential to anthropology has been produced. The essays comment on ethnographic work from middle of 19th century to almost end of 20th; they cover regions from Oceania through Southeast Asia, Andaman Islands and Southern Africa, to North and South America. The colonial situations also range from first contact through to establishment of power; from District Officer administrations through to white settler regimes; from internal colonialism to international mandates; from early pacification to wars of liberation; from expropriation of land to defence of ecology. The motivations and responses of anthropologists discussed are equally varied: romantic resistance of Maclay and complicity of Kubary in early colonialism; Malinowski's salesmanship of academic anthropology; Speck's advocacy of Indian land rights; Schneider's grappling with ambiguities of rapport; and Turner's facilitation of Kayapo cinematic activism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Women of Value, Men of Renown: New Perspectives in Trobriand Exchange
Montague, S. P., & Weiner, A. B. (1979) · Ethnohistory · doi:10.2307/481477 · Cited by 427
Benedict, R. (1934) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.1934.9917714 · Cited by 388
Cited by
The Shifting Middle Ground: Amazonian Indians and Eco‐Politics
CONKLIN, B. A., & GRAHAM, L. R. (1995) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1995.97.4.02a00120 · Cited by 760
Mignolo, W. D. (1992) · Comparative Studies in Society and History · doi:10.1017/s0010417500017709 · Cited by 125
Paradisal discourse: A critical analysis of marketing and consuming Hawaii
Costa, J. A. (1998) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/10253866.1998.9670305 · Cited by 93
Strange alliance: Pygmies in the colonial imaginary
Ballard, C. (2006) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438240500510155 · Cited by 27
Nation branding in Zimbabwe: Archaeological heritage, national cohesion, and corporate identities
Thondhlana, T. P., Chitima, S. S., & Chirikure, S. (2021) · Journal of Social Archaeology · doi:10.1177/14696053211002699 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 30-1576-30-1576
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W359580732
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 2
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colonial situations: essays on the contextualization of ethnographic knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-1576
- The paper
- Colonial situations: essays on the contextualization of ethnographic knowledge. (1992). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-1576
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.