The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Local justice: how institutions allocate scarce goods and necessary burdens
Abstract
A systematic analysis of the principle institutions use in allocating scarce goods and necessary burdens. It examines the criteria by which students are admitted to college, looking at the empirical, conceptual, explanatory and evaluative aspects of such issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation
Lamont, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022 · Cited by 1,492
Individual Differences in Faculty Research Time Allocations Across 13 Countries
Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2013) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9273-4 · Cited by 72
The letter versus the spirit of the law: a lay perspective on culpability
Garcia, S. M., Chen, P., & Gordon, M. T. (2014) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006835 · Cited by 54
Valuing different human lives.
Goodwin, G. P., & Landy, J. F. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0032796 · Cited by 48
Comparative configurational case analysis of ergonomic injuries
Marx, A., & van Hootegem, G. (2007) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.012 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 30-2319-30-2319
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1551678052
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
