The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Black looks: race and representation
Abstract
Preface to the New Edition Introduction 1. Loving Blackness as Political Resistance 2. Eating the Other 3. Revolutionary Black Women 4. Selling Hot Pussy 5. A Feminist Challenge 6. Reconstructing Black Masculinity 7. The Oppositional Gaze 8. Micheaux's Films 9. Is Paris Burning? 10. Madonna 11. Representations of Whiteness 12. Revolutionary Renegades
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Davis, K. (2008) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700108086364 · Cited by 2,539
Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research
Lincoln, Y. S. (1995) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/107780049500100301 · Cited by 1,568
The Best of Both Worlds: A Critical Pedagogy of Place
Gruenewald, D. A. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032004003 · Cited by 1,421
The unbearable heaviness of climate coloniality
Sultana, F. (2022) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102638 · Cited by 952
On misogynoir: citation, erasure, and plagiarism
Bailey, M. (2018) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1447395 · Cited by 659
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 30-2391-30-2391
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1571136830
- Cited by
- 4,673
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Black looks: race and representation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-2391
- The paper
- Black looks: race and representation. (1992). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-2391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
