The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Explanatory supplement to the Astronomical Almanac
Abstract
original Explanatory to the and the and Nautical Almanac was published in 1961 and revised in 1974. In 1981 the series of publications titled The Ephemeris and the American and Nautical Almanac were continued under the single title The Almanac. Thus, the title of the new edition of the Explanatory Supplement. In the 1970s it was recognized that there was a need to revise the planetary and lunar ephemerides, the FK4 star catalog, the time scales, the System of Constants and the Theory of Nutation. In 1984 all these revisions were introduced using the new standard epoch J2000.0, thus making the original Explanatory Supplement out of date. Hence, the new version was prepared based on the FK5 star catalog, the IAU (1976) System of Constants, the new time scales, including those adopted in 199 1, the IAU (1980) Theory, of Nutation, and the DE200/LE200 ephemerides. Improvements since 1984 have also been incorporated. Current values of astrometric and planetary data are included. Explanatory to the Almanac provides a detailed description of the means of performing practical astronomy or spherical astronomy. It shows how computations for the Astronomical Almanac are performed and the underlying information required by someone using that publication or wanting to perform related computations. It is intended to be a reference volume for anybody working with accurate positional astronomical data and anyone interested in investigations of the solar system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Achieving Better Than 1 Minute Accuracy in the Heliocentric and Barycentric Julian Dates
Eastman, J., Siverd, R., & Gaudi, B. S. (2010) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/655938 · Cited by 868
Study of the anomalous acceleration of Pioneer 10 and 11
Anderson, J. D., Laing, P. A., Lau, E. L., Liu, A. S., Nieto, M. M., & Turyshev, S. G. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.082004 · Cited by 585
Achieving sub-pixel geolocation accuracy in support of MODIS land science
Wolfe, R. E., Nishihama, M., Fleig, A. J., Kuyper, J. A., Roy, D. P., Storey, J. C., & Patt, F. S. (2002) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00085-8 · Cited by 525
Representations of celestial coordinates in FITS
Calabretta, M. R., & Greisen, E. W. (2002) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021327 · Cited by 431
Photometric Light Curves and Polarization of Close‐in Extrasolar Giant Planets
Seager, S., Whitney, B. A., & Sasselov, D. D. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309292 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1993-03-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 30-3807-30-3807
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1616341693
- Cited by
- 773
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explanatory supplement to the Astronomical Almanac. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-3807
- The paper
- Explanatory supplement to the Astronomical Almanac. (1993). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-3807
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.