The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The lenses of gender: transforming the debate on sexual inequality
Abstract
s theory, especially the lens of androcentrism, seems particularly outdated and unoriginal when compared with Catharine MacKinnon's work over the past fifteen years.In this book, however, Bern adds her significant psychological work on gender schematicity and androgyny to MacKinnon's sociolegal theories, thus giving a psychological framework to what legal scholars would otherwise recognize as MacKinnon's dominance theory.See infra note 6.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genital Knowledge and Gender Constancy in Preschool Children
Bem, S. L. (1989) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1989.tb02745.x · Cited by 181
Cited by
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20237 · Cited by 2,433
Why Research on Women Entrepreneurs Needs New Directions
Ahl, H. (2006) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.x · Cited by 2,036
Gender As a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism
Risman, B. J. (2004) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243204265349 · Cited by 1,451
Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000494 · Cited by 1,136
Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/595942 · Cited by 996
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1993-07-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 30-6444-30-6444
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2038466428
- Cited by
- 1,156
- References
- 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The lenses of gender: transforming the debate on sexual inequality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-6444
- The paper
- The lenses of gender: transforming the debate on sexual inequality. (1993). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-6444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
