The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Employee involvement: methods for improving performance and work attitudes
Abstract
The Need for Employee Involvement Empirical Research and Models of Employee Involvement Quality of Work Life Programs Quality Circles Scanlon Plans and Other Gainsharing Plans Representative Participation Job Enrichment Self-Directed Work Teams Employee Ownership Overall Findings and Future Directions for Research Final Conclusions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: PERSONAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS AT WORK.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256657 · Cited by 3,749
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content.
Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338 · Cited by 2,319
Impact of Culture on Human Resource Management Practices: A 10‐Country Comparison
Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. (2000) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00010 · Cited by 786
A Grounded Model of Organizational Schema Change During Empowerment
Labianca, G., Gray, B., & Brass, D. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.2.235.12512 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1993-09-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 31-0389-31-0389
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W589119004
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Employee involvement: methods for improving performance and work attitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.31-0389
- The paper
- Employee involvement: methods for improving performance and work attitudes. (1993). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-0389
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
