Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 758

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Health status and health policy: quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation

·1993·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

1: Health Status and Health Decisions. 2: A Strategy for Allocating Resources to Health Care. 3: Theoretical Foundations for Health-Related Quality of Life. 4: Concepts of Health-Related Quality of Life. 5: Types of Health-Related Quality of Life Assessments. 6: Assigning Values to Health States. 7: Selecting an Instrument for Primary Data Collection. 8: Developing a Strategy for Secondary Data Analysis. 9: Estimating Prognosis and Years of Healthy Life. 10: Estimating Direct and Indirect Health Care Costs. 11: Ranking Costs and Outcomes of Health Care Alternatives. 12: Preventing Disease and Promoting Health: Goals for the Nation. 13: Improving Health-Related Quality of Life Through Technology. 14: Improving Health Care Access. 15: The Limits of Rationality in Allocating Health Resources

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.31-1551

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 758

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1993-11-01
Volume
31
Issue
03
Pages
31-1551-31-1551
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W603357331
Cited by
758
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health status and health policy: quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.31-1551
The paper
Health status and health policy: quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation. (1993). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-1551

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.