The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life
Abstract
The common fruit fly, Drosophila, has long been one of the most productive of all laboratory animals. From 1910 to 1940, the centre of Drosophila culture in America was the school of Thomas Hunt Morgan and his students, Alfred Sturtevant and Calvin Bridges. They first created standard flies through inbreeding and by organizing a network for exchanging stocks of flies which spread their practices around the world. In Lords of the Fly, Robert E. Kohler argues that fly laboratories are a special kind of ecological niche in which the wild fruit fly is transformed into an artificial animal with a distinctive natural history. He shows that the fly was essentially a laboratory tool whose startling productivity opened many new lines of genetic research. Kohler also explores the moral economy of the Drosophilists: the rules for regulating access to research tools, allocating credit for achievements, and transferring authority from one generation of scientists to the next. By closely examining the Drosophilists' culture and customs, Kohler reveals essential features of how experimental scientists do their work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2158 · Cited by 709
The art and design of genetic screens: Drosophila melanogaster
St Johnston, D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg751 · Cited by 644
Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting
Frickel, S., Gibbon, S., Howard, J., Kempner, J., Ottinger, G., & Hess, D. J. (2010) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243909345836 · Cited by 632
Philosophy of experimental biology
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-5262 · Cited by 360
Beyond Epistemology: Relativism and Engagement in the Politics of Science
Jasanoff, S. (1996) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631296026002008 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1994-11-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 32-1518-32-1518
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1604556795
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.32-1518
- The paper
- Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. (1994). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-1518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.