The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting
Open accessAbstract
‘‘Undone science’’ refers to areas of research that are left unfunded, incomplete, or generally ignored but that social movements or civil society organizations often identify as worthy of more research. This study mobilizes four recent studies to further elaborate the concept of undone science as it relates to the political construction of research agendas. Using these cases, we develop the argument that undone science is part of a broader politics of knowledge, wherein multiple and competing groups struggle over the construction and implementation of alternative research agendas. Overall, the study demonstrates the analytic potential of the concept of undone science to deepen understanding of the systematic nonproduction of knowledge in the institutional matrix of state, industry, and social movements that is characteristic of recent calls for a ‘‘new political sociology of science.’’
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,249
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631289019003001 · Cited by 10,847
THE MORAL ECONOMY OF THE ENGLISH CROWD IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
Thompson, E. P. (1971) · Past and Present · doi:10.1093/past/50.1.76 · Cited by 4,736
Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674039681 · Cited by 3,956
Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty
Linder, F., Spear, J., Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3089636 · Cited by 3,381
Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0887 · Cited by 3,346
Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science.
Rossiter, M. W., & Haraway, D. (1990) · The Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/2079298 · Cited by 2,242
Lukes, S. (2005) · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5 · Cited by 2,141
The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience
Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312702032002003 · Cited by 2,094
Cited by
The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason
Bourdieu, P. (1975) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901847501400602 · Cited by 1,483
The social life of the “forever chemical”: PFAS pollution legacies and toxic events
Renfrew, D., & Pearson, T. W. (2021) · Environment and Society · doi:10.3167/ares.2021.120109 · Cited by 94
Toward thick legitimacy: Creating a web of legitimacy for agroecology
Montenegro de Wit, M., & Iles, A. (2016) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.12952/journal.elementa.000115 · Cited by 91
Wickham, G. M., & Shriver, T. E. (2021) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13253 · Cited by 63
Antiracism without Races: How Activists Produce Knowledge about Race and Policing in France
Boutros, M. (2024) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spac011 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Frickel, S., Gibbon, S., Howard, J., Kempner, J., Ottinger, G., & Hess, D. J.
- Venue
- Science, Technology, & Human Values
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-10-27
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 444-473
- ISSN
- 0162-2439 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8251
- OpenAlex
- W2116803854
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 20.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0162243909345836
- The paper
- Frickel, S., Gibbon, S., Howard, J., Kempner, J., Ottinger, G., & Hess, D. J. (2010). Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting. Science, Technology, & Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909345836
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
