The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How women legislate
Abstract
INTRODUCTION 1. Expectations and Natures 2. The Procedural Question: Reform or Adapt? 3. Legislative Products: The Influence of Women 4. The Nature of Support 5. The Context of Institutional Change 6. The Impact of Women 7. Predictions for the Future
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: Does gender matter?
Eagly, A. H. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.007 · Cited by 682
Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina
Franceschet, S., & Piscopo, J. M. (2008) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x08000342 · Cited by 620
Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race
Bratton, K. A., & Haynie, K. L. (1999) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2647822 · Cited by 615
Congressional Enactments of Race–Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced–Gendered Institutions
HAWKESWORTH, M. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000868 · Cited by 573
Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation
Sarah, C., & Mona, L. K. (2008) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00712.x · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1994-12-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 32-2409-32-2409
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2079649097
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How women legislate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.32-2409
- The paper
- How women legislate. (1994). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-2409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
