The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Voting for reform: democracy, political liberalization, and economic adjustment
Abstract
The widespread movement toward political liberalization and democratization is one of the most dramatic historical changes of the past two decades. But can a developing country balance a stable democracy with a well-functioning market economy? This book addresses this question by showing how political reforms influence the efforts of government to initiate and sustain economic reform. It illustrates the crucial link between political and economic reforms with case studies of eight countires at varying stages of political liberalization: Chile, Mexico, Nigeria, Poland, Senegal, Spain, Thailand, and Turkey. The studies focus on two clusters of policies: monetary and fiscal controls, and trade and exchange rate mechanisms. In contrast to many analyses, the studies consider these policies not only as functions of their intended economic effects but also as outcomes of interactions among politicians, bureaucrats, and interest groups. The studies also examine the evolving institutional context in each country. The authors discuss the effects of various political arrangements on economic adjustment efforts, although they recognized the intrinsic value of stable democratic government. The book explains how conflicts between pluralist politics and growth promoting economic policies can be resolved, and it shows why adjustment is not complete until the public has voted for reform. It will be of great use to both policymakers and students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mansfield, E. D., & Milner, H. V. (1999) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081899551002 · Cited by 567
Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade
Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V., & Rosendorff, B. P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586014 · Cited by 521
What Explains the Success or Failure of Structural Adjustment Programmes?
Dollar, D., & Svensson, J. (2000) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00569 · Cited by 469
Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.16387892 · Cited by 395
Does High Income Promote Democracy?
Londregan, J. B., & Poole, K. T. (1996) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1996.0024 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 32-4010-32-4010
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1513691268
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Voting for reform: democracy, political liberalization, and economic adjustment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.32-4010
- The paper
- Voting for reform: democracy, political liberalization, and economic adjustment. (1995). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-4010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.