Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 721

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Why we get sick: the new science of Darwinian medicine

Open access
·1995·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Using numerous examples drawn from many scientific disciplines, however, Hess does make a very strong case that past scientific developments have been strongly affected by cultural norms and power considerations. Hess further uses these examples to convincingly argue that the history of science has not been shaped solely by white males of European descent. He illustrates that individuals from numerous cultures and races, many of whom were in fact female, contributed significantly to major developments in many scientific enterprises. These contributions frequently have been either minimized or completely ignored due to the cultural emphasis of extolling the virtues of those in power, which typically have been Anglo-Saxon-Protestant white males.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.32-5693

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 721

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1995-06-01
Volume
32
Issue
10
Pages
32-5693-32-5693
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W2099901781
Cited by
721
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why we get sick: the new science of Darwinian medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.32-5693
The paper
Why we get sick: the new science of Darwinian medicine. (1995). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-5693

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.