The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mental leaps: analogy in creative thought
Abstract
Part 1 First steps: a bird's backyard analogic from Socrates to Velcro and Vietnam indirect communication ripples in the air creative connections overview. Part 2 Breaking loose: funes in chains from reacting to thinking similarity structure models purpose and cause summary. Part 3 The analogical ape: sameness what Sarah thinks how thought evolved the analogies of apes the invention of problems hitting the wall summary. Part 4 The analogical child: Lori's magic carpet toward system mapping first relations early relational mapping personification the next steps summary. Part 5 The construction of similarity: making Saddam into Hitler the tumour and the fortress selection mapping evaluation learning summary. Part 6 What is to be done?: Howard's dilemma coherent decisions houses and baseball players courtroom analogies lessons of the past no more Vietnams summary. Part 7 Wondering why: gods like us Plato's cave designing the world other minds intuition pumps Asian analogies summary. Part 8 The analogical scientist: great scientific analogies purposes cognitive mechanisms social sciences invention and design lessons summary. Part 9 The web of culture: the Japanese tea ceremony Star Trek and the hidden paths what is metaphor? the analogical basis metaphorical extensions laughter and love analogy as therapy making magic summary. Part 10 The analogical computer: looking backward the computational mind parallel constraint satisfaction mapping retrieval the competition the future of analogy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010) · Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research · doi:10.1075/celcr.14 · Cited by 1,368
Keil, F. C. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100 · Cited by 1,350
Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x08003543 · Cited by 1,174
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (1998) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x98001769 · Cited by 912
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1995-07-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 32-6192-32-6192
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1994335990
- Cited by
- 1,612
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mental leaps: analogy in creative thought. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.32-6192
- The paper
- Mental leaps: analogy in creative thought. (1995). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-6192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.