The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The evolution of the airline industry
Abstract
Since the deregulation of the airline industry, the intensity of the debate over its controversial issues has intensified. Economic regulation provided a certain stability for both passengers and the industry: fares were predictable and uniform, carriers' earnings fluctuated but bankruptcies were averted through mergers sanctioned by the Civil Aeronautics Board, and air safety steadily improved. Deregulation changed everything. A new fare structure took shape. Travelers faced a variety of fares and concomitant travel restrictions. New carriers entered the industry, but nearly as many left, through merger or bankruptcy. As financial pressures mounted, safety practices came into question. Many critics called for a return to some form of regulation. The evolution and likely direction of the industry needs to be reassessed anew. That is the purpose of this book. It proceeds by providing a comprehensive empirical profile of the industry as it has evolved both before and since deregulation. It identifies the central issues facing travelers and carriers and assesses their severity and underlying causes. It develops a basis for understanding the industry's evolution and the ways the industry may eventually adapt to the unregulated economic environment. It also discusses whether government policy can play an effective role in improving airline performance. It concludes that the evolution of the airline industry is proceeding in a direction that will preserve and possibly enhance the benefits of deregulation for travelers and carriers; and that the federal government's policy should expand deregulation to include international travel.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Information Technology and the Future of Cities
Gaspar, J., & Glaeser, E. L. (1998) · Journal of Urban Economics · doi:10.1006/juec.1996.2031 · Cited by 734
On sources of market power in the airline industry: Panel data evidence from the US airports
Bilotkach, V., & Lakew, P. A. (2014) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.11.011 · Cited by 44
Optimality of the hub-spoke system: A review of the literature, and directions for future research
Pels, E. (2021) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.08.002 · Cited by 35
A tale of airline competition: When full-service carriers undercut low-cost carriers fares
Avogadro, N., Malighetti, P., Redondi, R., & Salanti, A. (2021) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102027 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1996-02-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 33-3423-33-3423
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2002355993
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of the airline industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.33-3423
- The paper
- The evolution of the airline industry. (1996). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-3423
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.