Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,754

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Becoming a critically reflective teacher

·1996·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

What It Means to Be a Critically Reflective Teacher. Becoming Critically Reflective: A Process of Learning and Change. Learning to Know Ourselves: The Value of Autobiography. Surprised by the Familiar: What Autobiographies Reveal. Seeing Ourselves Through Our Students' Eyes. Understanding Classroom Dynamics: The Critical Incident Questionnaire. Holding Critical Conversations About Teaching. Solving Problems Collaboratively: The Good Practices Audit. Storming the Citadel: Reading Theory Critically. Using the Literature of Critical Reflection. Negotiating the Risks of Critical Reflection. Creating a Culture of Reflection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.33-5232

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 3,754

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1996-05-01
Volume
33
Issue
09
Pages
33-5232-33-5232
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1493735179
Cited by
3,754
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Becoming a critically reflective teacher. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.33-5232
The paper
Becoming a critically reflective teacher. (1996). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-5232

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.