Cited by 1,046Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Education and AssessmentsMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques

Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices

Open access
Korthagen, Fred, Loughran, John, Russell, Tom·2006·Teaching and Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Korthagen et al. point out seven basic principles that could improve teacher training.

    “Regarding the programs that have been successful in bringing together teaching theory and practice analysed by Korthagen et al. (2006), they point out seven basic principles that could improve teacher training.”
  • Theoretically based knowledge is generally traditional and university based, while experience-based knowledge is more school based and focused in and on classroom realities.

    “While the theoretically based knowledge is generally traditional in nature and university based, the experience-based knowledge is more school based and more focused 'in' and 'on' classroom realities (Darling-Hammond 2006; Korthagen et al. 2006).”

    From Pedagogical dilemma in teacher education: Bridging the theory practice gap (2023) · cites this paper as Korthagen et al. 2006

  • Teacher educators in all three programs share the assertion that one does not learn through experience, but through reflection on experience and through interaction with others.

    “'Teacher educators in all three programs share the assertion that one does not learn through experience, but through reflection on experience and through interaction with others' (Korthagen et al. 2006, 1025).”

    From Pedagogical dilemma in teacher education: Bridging the theory practice gap (2023) · cites this paper as Korthagen et al. 2006, 1025

  • In Korthagen et al.'s comparative study across three continents, while organisational structure was important, the central factor remains how to manage learning from practice.

    “Their results show that while the organisational structure was important, the central factor still remains the question of how to manage learning from practice.”

    From Pedagogical dilemma in teacher education: Bridging the theory practice gap (2023) · cites this paper as Korthagen et al. (2006)

  • Student teachers need opportunities to understand planning, doing, and reflecting on teaching, and to link these to the relationship between teaching and concurrent learning.

    “'To fully illuminate the dynamics of a teaching situation, student teachers need opportunities to understand what is involved in planning the teaching, doing the teaching and reflecting on the teaching. Then they need to link all of these to the relationship between the teaching and the concurrent learning.'”

    From Pedagogical dilemma in teacher education: Bridging the theory practice gap (2023) · cites this paper as Korthagen et al. (2006, 1025)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
Korthagen, Fred
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
1020-1041
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126865987
Cited by
1,046
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 35
FWCI
80.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Keywords
teacher professional development, fundamental principles, pre-service teachers, theory-practice linkage, program development, pedagogy teacher education, international comparison of teacher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review