The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trust in modern societies: the search for the bases of social order
Abstract
Introduction. 1. Defining Trust. 2. Classical Sociology and the Search for Order. 3. Functions of Trust. 4. Trust as Habitus. 5. Trust as Passion. 6. Trust as Policy. Bibliography. Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Political Trust and Trustworthiness
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475 · Cited by 2,190
On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model
Corritore, C. L., Kracher, B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00041-7 · Cited by 1,200
The Structure of Optimal Trust: Moral and Strategic Implications
Wicks, A. C., Berman, S. L., & Jones, T. M. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1580443 · Cited by 785
Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy
Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Hunter, S., High, H., & Evans, B. (2010) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.055 · Cited by 686
Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI
Jacovi, A., Marasović, A., Miller, T., & Goldberg, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445923 · Cited by 545
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1996-10-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 34-1248-34-1248
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1512819087
- Cited by
- 840
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trust in modern societies: the search for the bases of social order. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.34-1248
- The paper
- Trust in modern societies: the search for the bases of social order. (1996). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-1248
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.