The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coloniality in the cliff swallow: the effect of group size on social behavior
Abstract
Many animal species live and breed in colonies. Although biologists have documented numerous costs (increased competition for limited resources) and benefits (more pairs of eyes to watch for predators) of group living, they often still do not agree on why coloniality evolved in the first place. Drawing on their 12-year study of a population of cliff swallows in Nebraska, USA, the authors investigate 26 social and ecological costs and benefits of coloniality. They explore how these costs and benefits are reflected in reproductive success and survivorship, and speculate on the evolution of cliff swallow coloniality. This study of vertebrate coloniality should be of interest to all who study social animals, including behavioural ecologists, population biologists, ornithologists and parasitologists. Its focus on the evolution of coloniality should also appeal to evolutionary biologists and to psychologists studying decision making in animals. authors' research on swallows was the subject of an award-winning exhibition at the Peabody Museum of Natural History in New Haven, Connecticut, and was included in the BBC television production, The Trials of Life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Someplace like home: Experience, habitat selection and conservation biology
Stamps, J. A., & Swaisgood, R. R. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.038 · Cited by 355
Brown, C. R., & Brown, M. B. (1998) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02027.x · Cited by 288
Heithaus, M. R., Wirsing, A. J., Burkholder, D., Thomson, J., & Dill, L. M. (2009) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01512.x · Cited by 239
A conceptual framework for nonkin food sharing: timing and currency of benefits
Stevens, J. R., & Gilby, I. C. (2004) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.04.012 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1996-11-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 34-1543-34-1543
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1981701994
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coloniality in the cliff swallow: the effect of group size on social behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.34-1543
- The paper
- Coloniality in the cliff swallow: the effect of group size on social behavior. (1996). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-1543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.