The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Producing guanxi: sentiment, self, and subculture in a North China village
Abstract
Throughout China the formation of guanxi, or social connections, involves friends, families, colleagues, and acquaintances in complex networks of social support and sentimental attachment. Focusing on this process in one rural north China village, Fengjia, Andrew B. Kipnis shows what guanxi production reveals about the evolution of village political economy, kinship and gender, and local patterns of subjectivity in Dengist China. His work offers a detailed description of the communicative actions - such as gift giving, being a host or guest, participating in weddings or funerals - that produce, manage, and deny guanxi in a specific time and place. Kipnis also offers a rare comparative analysis of how these practices relate to the varied and variable phenomenon of guanxi throughout China and as it has changed over time. Producing Guanxi combines the theory of Pierre Bourdieu and the insights of symbolic anthropology to contest past portrayals of guanxi as either a function of Chinese political economics or an unchanging Confucian social structure. In this analysis guanxi emerges as a purposeful human effort that makes use of past cultural logics while generating new ones. By exploring the role of sentiment in the creation of self, Kipnis critiques recent theories of subjectivity for their narrow focus on language and discourse, and contributes to the anthropological discussion of comparative selfhood. Navigating a path between mainstream social science and abstract social theory, Kipnis presents a more nuanced examination of guanxi than has previously been available and contributes generally to our understanding of relationships and human action. His findings will interest students of Chinese society as well as scholars across the fields of anthropology, cultural studies, gender studies, and social psychology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Declining Significance of Guanxi in China's Economic Transition
Guthrie, D. (1998) · The China Quarterly · doi:10.1017/s0305741000002034 · Cited by 647
Questioning guanxi: definition, classification and implications
Fan, Y. (2002) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/s0969-5931(02)00036-7 · Cited by 458
Entrepreneurs’ access to private equity in China: The role of social capital
Batjargal, B., & Liu, M. (. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0044 · Cited by 454
Guanxi Practices and Trust in Management: A Procedural Justice Perspective
Chen, C. C., Chen, Y.-R., & Xin, K. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0047 · Cited by 441
Phatic labor, infrastructure, and the question of empowerment in Cairo
ELYACHAR, J. (2010) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01265.x · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 35-2796-35-2796
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2005941649
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Producing guanxi: sentiment, self, and subculture in a North China village. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.35-2796
- The paper
- Producing guanxi: sentiment, self, and subculture in a North China village. (1998). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-2796
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.