The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Good government in the tropics
Abstract
In Good Government in the Tropics, Judith Tendler argues against widely prevailing views about why governments so often do badly and about what causes them to perform well when they do. This raises questions, she says, about the policy advice proffered today by the mainstream donor community. Drawing on a set of four cases involving public bureaucracies at work under the direction of an innovative state government in Brazil, Tendler offers findings of significance to the current debates about organization of the public-sector workplace, public service delivery, decentralization, and the interaction between government and civil society
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/15.2.225 · Cited by 4,339
Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134367 · Cited by 9,665
Social Capital and Community Governance
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00077 · Cited by 1,538
Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method
Snyder, R. (2001) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/bf02687586 · Cited by 1,002
Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?
Fox, J. A. (2015) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011 · Cited by 803
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 35-2967-35-2967
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1525764571
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Good government in the tropics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.35-2967
- The paper
- Good government in the tropics. (1998). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-2967
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
