Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,052

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Early childhood environment rating scale

·1999·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

The ECERS -- R has been expanded to 43 items and includes many improvements that will make this widely used resource even more valuable to early educators. Examples of new items include: Interaction items, such as staff-child interactions, interactions among children, and discipline -- Curriculum items, such as nature/science and math/number -- Health and Safety items -- More inclusive and culturally sensitive indicators for many items -- More items focusing on staff needs -- and much more. The scale is conveniently organized under seven categories: Space and Furnishings, Personal Care Routines, Language-Reasoning, Activities, Interactions, Program Structure, Parents and Staff.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.36-3454

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,052

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1999-02-01
Volume
36
Issue
06
Pages
36-3454-36-3454
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1488142001
Cited by
1,052
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early childhood environment rating scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.36-3454
The paper
Early childhood environment rating scale. (1999). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-3454

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.