The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Remediation: understanding new media
Abstract
Part 1 Theory: immediacy, hypermediacy and remediation mediation and remediation networks of remediation. Part 2 Media: computer games digital photography photorealistic graphics digital art film virtual reality mediated spaces television the World Wide Web ubiquitous computing convergence. Part 3 Self: the remediated self the virtual self the networked self conclusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Livingstone, S. (2008) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444808089415 · Cited by 1,780
Understanding Social Media Logic
Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v1i1.70 · Cited by 1,258
Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and U.S. Biomedicine
Clarke, A. E., Shim, J. K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., & Fishman, J. R. (2003) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240306800201 · Cited by 560
Genre and Game Studies: Toward a Critical Approach to Video Game Genres
Apperley, T. H. (2006) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878105282278 · Cited by 520
Graham, S. D. N. (2005) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/0309132505ph568oa · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1999-05-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 36-4895-36-4895
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2254117219
- Cited by
- 4,286
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remediation: understanding new media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.36-4895
- The paper
- Remediation: understanding new media. (1999). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-4895
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
