The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Soil analysis: an interpretation manual
Abstract
Soil Analysis: An Interpretation Manual is a practical guide to soil tests. It considers what soil tests are, when they can be used reliably and consistently, and discusses what limits their application. It is the first nationally accepted publication that is appropriate for Australian soils and conditions. The first three chapters review the general principles and concepts of soil testing, factors affecting soil test interpretation and soil sampling and handling procedures. The next two chapters describe morphological indicators of soil and include colour plates of major Australian agricultural soils. These are followed by a series of chapters which present soil test calibration data for individual elements or a related group of tests such as the range of soil tests used to interpret soil acidity. Each of these chapters also summarises the reactions of the particular element or parameter in the soil and describes the tests commonly used in Australia. The final chapter presents a structured approach to nutrient management and making fertiliser recommendations using soil test data. The manual will be of particular interest to soil and environmental scientists, farm advisers, consultants and primary producers who will find the manual an essential reference to understanding and interpreting soil test data. Many of the soil tests evaluated in the book are used throughout the world. Soil Analysis: An Interpretation Manual was commissioned and developed by the Australian Soil and Plant Analysis Council (ASPAC). It comprises the work of 37 experts, which has been extensively peer reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Selenium in global food systems
Combs, G. F. (2001) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn2000280 · Cited by 1,129
Stable soil organic matter: A comparison of C:N:P:S ratios in Australian and other world soils
Kirkby, C. A., Kirkegaard, J. A., Richardson, A. E., Wade, L. J., Blanchard, C., & Batten, G. (2011) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.04.010 · Cited by 494
Matthiessen, J. N., & Kirkegaard, J. A. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680600611543 · Cited by 473
Strategies and agronomic interventions to improve the phosphorus-use efficiency of farming systems
Simpson, R. J., Oberson, A., Culvenor, R. A., Ryan, M. H., Veneklaas, E. J., Lambers, H., Lynch, J. P., Ryan, P. R., Delhaize, E., Smith, F. A., et al. (2011) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-011-0880-1 · Cited by 462
Cycling and composition of organic matter in terrestrial and marine ecosystems
Baldock, J. A., Masiello, C. A., Gélinas, Y., & Hedges, J. I. (2004) · Marine Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2004.06.016 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1999-10-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 37-0952-37-0952
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W151870050
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil analysis: an interpretation manual. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.37-0952
- The paper
- Soil analysis: an interpretation manual. (1999). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-0952
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.