The Root causes of biodiversity loss
Abstract
The world is losing species and biodiversity at an unprecedented rate. The causes go deep and the losses are driven by a complex array of social, economic, political and biological factors at different levels. Immediate causes such as over-harvesting, pollution and habitat change have been well studied, but the socioeconomic factors driving people to degrade their environment are less well understood. This book examines the underlying causes. It provides analyses of a range of case studies from Brazil, Cameroon, China, Danube River Basin, India, Mexico, Pakistan, Philippines, Tanzania and Vietnam, and integrates them into a new and interdisciplinary framework for understanding what is happening. From these results, the editors are able to derive policy conclusions and recommendations for operational and institutional approaches to address the root causes and reverse the current trends. It makes a contribution to the understanding of all those - from ecologists and conservationists to economists and policy makers - working on one of the major challenges we face.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Industrialization and rural-to-urban migration can raise agricultural wages and increase demand for modern agricultural technologies.
“Industrialization and migration from rural to urban areas can improve agricultural salaries and enhance the demand for modern agricultural technologies.(99)”
From The era of sustainable agricultural development in Africa: Understanding the benefits and constraints (2018) · cites this paper as [99]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using conceptual models as a planning and evaluation tool in conservation
Margoluis, R., Stem, C., Salafsky, N., & Brown, M. (2009) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.09.007 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Adenle, A. A., Azadi, H., & Manning, L. (2018) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2017.1300913 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 38-3313-38-3313
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W310021334
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
- Keywords
- biodiversity loss, root causes, overharvesting, pollution, habitat change, conservation policy, environmental policy recommendations, interdisciplinary framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review