The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infections and inequalities: the modern plagues
Abstract
Paul Farmer has battled AIDS in rural Haiti and deadly strains of drug-resistant tuberculosis in the slums of Peru. A physician-anthropologist with more than fifteen years in the field, Farmer writes from the front lines of the war against these modern plagues and shows why, even more than those of history, they target the poor. What is it like to be a doctor to the poor, observing with an anthropologist's eye the harsh juxtapositions of excess and misery? Moving regularly from the teaching hospitals of Harvard, themselves abutting urban poverty, to a clinic in the hills of Haiti's Central Plateau, Farmer has experienced firsthand the peculiarly modern inequality that seems inseparable from AIDS, TB, malaria, and typhoid in the modern world, and that feeds emerging (or re-emerging) infectious diseases such as Ebola and cholera. In his stories of sickness and suffering, Farmer challenges the accepted methodologies of epidemiology and international health. He argues that most current explanations, from cost-effectiveness to patient non-compliance, inevitably lead to blaming the victims. This moving account is far from a hopeless inventory of insoluble problems. Farmer tells us what can be done in the face of seemingly overwhelming odds, by physicians determined to treat those in need. Deeply humane and harrowing in its detail, Infections and Inequalities weds meticulous scholarship with a passion for solutions-remedies for the plagues of the poor and the social maladies that have sustained them. The war against the plagues of the modern world, along with remedies for the plagues of the poor & the social maladies that have sustained them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structural competency: Theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality
Metzl, J. M., & Hansen, H. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.032 · Cited by 1,873
Stigma in the HIV/AIDS epidemic: a review of the literature and recommendations for the way forward
Mahajan, A. P., Sayles, J. N., Patel, V. A., Remien, R. H., Sawires, S. R., Ortiz, D. J., Szekeres, G., & Coates, T. J. (2008) · AIDS · doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000327438.13291.62 · Cited by 1,404
Syndemics and public health: Reconceptualizing disease in bio-social context
Singer, M., & Clair, S. (2003) · Medical Anthropology Quarterly · doi:10.1525/maq.2003.17.4.423 · Cited by 1,140
(2001) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.91.6.927 · Cited by 1,060
Social Context, Sexual Networks, and Racial Disparities in Rates of Sexually Transmitted Infections
Adimora, A. A., & Schoenbach, V. J. (2005) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/425280 · Cited by 650
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 38-3356-38-3356
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1487947078
- Cited by
- 958
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infections and inequalities: the modern plagues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.38-3356
- The paper
- Infections and inequalities: the modern plagues. (2001). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.38-3356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.