Cited by 1,404HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Stigma in the HIV/AIDS epidemic: a review of the literature and recommendations for the way forward

Open access
Mahajan, Anish P, Sayles, Jennifer N, Patel, Vishal A, Remien, Robert H, Sawires, Sharif R, Ortiz, Daniel J, Szekeres, Greg, Coates, Thomas J·2008·AIDS

Abstract

Although stigma is considered a major barrier to effective responses to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, stigma reduction efforts are relegated to the bottom of AIDS programme priorities. The complexity of HIV/AIDS-related stigma is often cited as a primary reason for the limited response to this pervasive phenomenon. In this paper, we systematically review the scientific literature on HIV/AIDS-related stigma to document the current state of research, identify gaps in the available evidence and highlight promising strategies to address stigma. We focus on the following key challenges: defining, measuring and reducing HIV/AIDS-related stigma as well as assessing the impact of stigma on the effectiveness of HIV prevention and treatment programmes. Based on the literature, we conclude by offering a set of recommendations that may represent important next steps in a multifaceted response to stigma in the HIV/AIDS epidemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.aids.0000327438.13291.62

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [57]Herek GM Capitanio JP Widaman KF Stigma, social risk, and health policy: public attitudes toward HIV surveillance policies and the social construction of illness Health Psychol 2003 22 533 540 14570537

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahajan, A. P., Sayles, J. N., Patel, V. A., Remien, R. H., Sawires, S. R., Ortiz, D. J., Szekeres, G., & Coates, T. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (US)
Corresponding author
Mahajan, Anish P
Venue
AIDS
Published
2008-08
Volume
22
Issue
Suppl 2
Pages
S67-S79
ISSN
0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974975401
Cited by
1,404
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 110 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 120 · 2012: 62
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH043520)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
stigma reduction, stigma measurement, HIV prevention programs, HIV treatment programs
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Prejudice, Risk-Taking, Social Alienation, Stereotyping, HIV Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review