Cited by 75Religious Studies and Spiritual PracticesReligion, Gender, and EnlightenmentGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Divine feminine: theosophy and feminism in England

·2002·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Contents: I Domesticating the Occult 1 The Undomesticated Occult 2 The Mahatmas in Clubland: Manliness and Scientific Spirituality 3 Deficiency of the Male Element: Gendering Spiritual Experience 4 Buggery and Humbuggery: Sex, Magic, and Occult Authority II Political Alchemies 5 Occult Body Politics 6 The Divine Hermaphrodite and the Female Messiah: Feminism and Spirituality in the 1890s 7 A New Age for Women: Suffrage and the Sacred 8 Ancient Wisdom, Modern Motherhood Conclusion

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.39-6363

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2002-07-01
Volume
39
Issue
11
Pages
39-6363-39-6363
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W2091518468
Cited by
75
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
Theosophy, feminism, occultism, Theosophical Society, gender and spirituality, divine feminine, New Age, women's suffrage, motherhood, Victorian England, 1890s

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review