The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lessons from Amazonia: the ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest
Abstract
Deforestation is occurring at an alarming rate in many parts of the world, causing destruction of natural habitat and fragmentation of what remains. Nowhere is this problem more pressing than in the Amazon rainforest, which is rapidly vanishing in the face of enormous pressure from humans to exploit it. This book presents the results of the longest-running and most comprehensive study of forest fragmentation ever undertaken, the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP) in central Amazonia, the only experimental study of tropical forest fragmentation in which baseline data are available before isolation from continuous forest took place. A joint project of Brazil's National Institute for Research in Amazonia and the U.S. Smithsonian Institution, the BDFFP has investigated the many effects that habitat fragmentation has on plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates. The book provides an overview of the BDFFP, reports on its case studies, looks at forest ecology and tree genetics, and considers what issues are involved in establishing conservation and management guidelines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22‐Year Investigation
Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., Vasconcelos, H. L., Bruna, E. M., Didham, R. K., Stouffer, P. C., Gascon, C., Bierregaard, R. O., Laurance, S. G., & Sampaio, E. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01025.x · Cited by 1,847
Rates of species loss from Amazonian forest fragments
Ferraz, G., Russell, G. J., Stouffer, P. C., Bierregaard, R. O., Pimm, S. L., & Lovejoy, T. E. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2336195100 · Cited by 350
Santos, B. A., Peres, C. A., Oliveira, M. A., Grillo, A., Alves-Costa, C. P., & Tabarelli, M. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.09.018 · Cited by 337
The future of tropical species in secondary forests: A quantitative review
Dent, D. H., & Joseph Wright, S. (2009) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.035 · Cited by 320
de Castilho, C. V., Magnusson, W. E., de Araújo, R. N. O., Luizão, R. C. C., Luizão, F. J., Lima, A. P., & Higuchi, N. (2006) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.024 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 39-6427-39-6427
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1515720114
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lessons from Amazonia: the ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.39-6427
- The paper
- Lessons from Amazonia: the ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest. (2002). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.39-6427
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.