Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Perspectives.
Abstract
The last decade saw arrival of a new player in creation/evolution debate--the intelligent design creationism (IDC) movement, whose strategy is to act as the to overturn Darwinism and scientific naturalism. This anthology of writings by prominent creationists and their critics focuses on what is novel about new movement. It serves as a companion to Robert Pennock's Tower of Babel, in which he criticizes wedge movement, as well as other new varieties of creationism.The book contains articles previously published in specialized, hard-to-find journals, as well as new contributions. Each section contains introductory background information, articles by influential creationists and their critics, and in some cases responses by creationists. The discussions cover IDC as a political movement, IDC's philosophical attack on evolution, theological debate over apparent conflict between evolution and Bible, IDC's scientific claims, and philosopher Alvin Plantinga's critique of naturalism and evolution. The book concludes with Pennock's Why Creationism Should Not Be Taught in Public Schools.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For the illustrative cases Dembski has given, a Darwinian mechanism can discover CSI.
“and for the illustrative cases he has given, critics have shown that a Darwinian mechanism can discover CSI (59,62,63).”
From Creationism and intelligent design. (2003) · cites this paper as [62]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boudry, M., Blancke, S., & Braeckman, J. (2010) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-010-9178-7 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Creationism and intelligent design.
Pennock, R. T. (2003) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.4.070802.110400 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2002-10-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 40-0857-40-0857
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W370690743
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Keywords
- creationism, evolution, Darwinism, scientific naturalism, philosophy of biology, Alvin Plantinga, science and religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review