Cited by 225Evolution and Science EducationPhilosophy and History of ScienceTheology and Philosophy of Evil

Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Perspectives.

·2002·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

The last decade saw arrival of a new player in creation/evolution debate--the intelligent design creationism (IDC) movement, whose strategy is to act as the to overturn Darwinism and scientific naturalism. This anthology of writings by prominent creationists and their critics focuses on what is novel about new movement. It serves as a companion to Robert Pennock's Tower of Babel, in which he criticizes wedge movement, as well as other new varieties of creationism.The book contains articles previously published in specialized, hard-to-find journals, as well as new contributions. Each section contains introductory background information, articles by influential creationists and their critics, and in some cases responses by creationists. The discussions cover IDC as a political movement, IDC's philosophical attack on evolution, theological debate over apparent conflict between evolution and Bible, IDC's scientific claims, and philosopher Alvin Plantinga's critique of naturalism and evolution. The book concludes with Pennock's Why Creationism Should Not Be Taught in Public Schools.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.40-0857

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the illustrative cases Dembski has given, a Darwinian mechanism can discover CSI.

    “and for the illustrative cases he has given, critics have shown that a Darwinian mechanism can discover CSI (59,62,63).”

    From Creationism and intelligent design. (2003) · cites this paper as [62]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2002-10-01
Volume
40
Issue
02
Pages
40-0857-40-0857
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W370690743
Cited by
225
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Keywords
creationism, evolution, Darwinism, scientific naturalism, philosophy of biology, Alvin Plantinga, science and religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review