The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Universities in the marketplace: the commercialization of higher education
Abstract
Is everything in a university for sale if the price is right? In this book, one of America's leading educators cautions that the answer is all too often yes. Taking the first comprehensive look at the growing commercialization of our academic institutions, Derek Bok probes the efforts on campus to profit financially not only from athletics but increasingly, from education and research as well. He shows how such ventures are undermining core academic values and what universities can do to limit the damage. Commercialization has many causes, but it could never have grown to its present state had it not been for the recent, rapid growth of money-making opportunities in a more technologically complex, knowledge-based economy. A brave new world has now emerged in which university presidents, enterprising professors, and even administrative staff can all find seductive opportunities to turn specialized knowledge into profit. Bok argues that universities, faced with these temptations, are jeopardizing their fundamental mission in their eagerness to make money by agreeing to more and more compromises with basic academic values. He discusses the dangers posed by increased secrecy in corporate-funded research, for-profit Internet companies funded by venture capitalists, industry-subsidized educational programs for physicians, conflicts of interest in research on human subjects, and other questionable activities. While entrepreneurial universities may occasionally succeed in the short term, reasons Bok, only those institutions that vigorously uphold academic values, even at the cost of a few lucrative ventures, will win public trust and retain the respect of faculty and students. Candid, evenhanded, and eminently readable, Universities in the Marketplace will be widely debated by all those concerned with the future of higher education in America and beyond.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities
O'Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011 · Cited by 939
Does Competition Destroy Ethical Behavior?
Shleifer, A. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828041301498 · Cited by 624
Neo-Liberalism and Marketisation: The Implications for Higher Education
Lynch, K. (2006) · European Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2304/eerj.2006.5.1.1 · Cited by 599
The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships
Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5 · Cited by 384
Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.1177/0092055x12446624 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2003-10-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 41-1047-41-1047
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1572434726
- Cited by
- 1,321
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Universities in the marketplace: the commercialization of higher education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.41-1047
- The paper
- Universities in the marketplace: the commercialization of higher education. (2003). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-1047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.