The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Teaching science for social justice
Abstract
How might science education reflect the values of a socially just and democratic society? Using a combination of in-depth case studies and rigorous theory, this volume offers a series of teaching stories that describe inner city youth's practices of science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., & Carlson, J. (2010) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20329 · Cited by 339
Justice‐centered science pedagogy: A catalyst for academic achievement and social transformation
Morales‐Doyle, D. (2017) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21305 · Cited by 331
Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20141 · Cited by 108
Becoming an urban science teacher: How beginning teachers negotiate contradictory school contexts
Marco‐Bujosa, L. M., McNeill, K. L., & Friedman, A. A. (2020) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21583 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 41-4789-41-4789
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W568505678
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teaching science for social justice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.41-4789
- The paper
- Teaching science for social justice. (2004). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-4789
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
