The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Justice‐centered science pedagogy: A catalyst for academic achievement and social transformation
Abstract
Longstanding inequities in science education across the lines of race and class remain the most intractable problem in the field. Justice‐centered science pedagogy is introduced as a theoretical framework built on the traditions of critical pedagogy and culturally relevant pedagogy to address these inequities as components of larger oppressive systems. This study examines how a justice‐centered advanced chemistry class in an urban neighborhood high school supported students to succeed academically while taking up urgent issues of social and environmental justice identified by their communities. The findings include evidence that curriculum organized around an issue of environmental racism supported academic achievement that exceeded the expectations of a typical high school chemistry course. The findings also document how the curriculum provided opportunities for students to move beyond academic achievement to position themselves as transformative intellectuals. As transformative intellectuals, students demonstrated complex thinking about science and social justice issues, cultivated their commitment to their communities and cultures of origin, and developed credibility as local youth knowledgeable in science. These findings have implications for teachers, teacher educators, and educational researchers who wish to engage with science education as a catalyst for social transformation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,763
Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4628 · Cited by 8,835
(2013) · Cited by 6,708
Selections from the Prison Notebooks
GRAMSCI, A. (2007) · On Violence · doi:10.2307/j.ctv120qr2d.14 · Cited by 6,400
Wuana, R. A., & Okieimen, F. E. (2011) · ISRN Ecology · doi:10.5402/2011/402647 · Cited by 3,822
But that's just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy
Ladson‐Billings, G. (1995) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405849509543675 · Cited by 3,482
The dreamkeepers: successful teachers of African American children
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-6346 · Cited by 3,156
Burawoy, M. (1998) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00040 · Cited by 2,916
Subtractive Schooling: US-Mexican Youth and the Politics of Caring
(2002) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050208667759 · Cited by 2,341
A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methods
BARROWS, H. S. (1986) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01386.x · Cited by 2,275
Cited by
Hilts, A., Part, R., & Bernacki, M. L. (2018) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21449 · Cited by 91
Riter, D., & Holly Jr., J. (2024) · Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) · doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1406 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Morales‐Doyle, D.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-09-26
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1034-1060
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2757210224
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 47.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Justice‐centered science pedagogy: A catalyst for academic achievement and social transformation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sce.21305
- The paper
- Morales‐Doyle, D. (2017). Justice‐centered science pedagogy: A catalyst for academic achievement and social transformation. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.