Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,434

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Good Muslim, bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the roots of terror

·2004·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

When the event we know as Nine Eleven happened, I was in New York City. As the weeks rolled by, and I read the American Press to try and make sense of the kind of debate that was developing, I was struck by reports that more and more Americans were going to bookshops to buy copies of the Koran—to understand the motivation of those who highjacked the planes, and drove them into the Twin Towers. Soon the New York Times was telling us that the Koran was amongst one of the highest-selling books in American bookshops.... As the weeks rolled by there was the American invasion of Afghanistan, and then of Iraq. I wondered how many Afghanis and Iraqis were going to bookshops to buy copies of the Bible, to gain an understanding into the motivation of those who were dropping bombs on them. Like others, I knew that President Bush claimed to have a direct connection with God and claimed to be

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.42-1839

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,434

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2004-11-01
Volume
42
Issue
03
Pages
42-1839-42-1839
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1605963737
Cited by
1,434
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Good Muslim, bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the roots of terror. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.42-1839
The paper
Good Muslim, bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the roots of terror. (2004). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-1839

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.