Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 554

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Regression analysis for categorical moderators

·2005·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

1. What Is a Moderator Variable and Why Should We Care? Why Should We Study Moderator Variables? Distinction between Moderator and Mediator Variables Importance of A Priori Rationale in Investigating Moderating Effects Conclusions 2. Moderated Multiple Regression What Is MMR? Endorsement of MMR as an Appropriate Technique Pervasive Use of MMR in the Social Sciences: Literature Review Conclusions 3. Performing and Interpreting Moderated Multiple Regression Analysis Using Computer Programs Research Scenario Data Set Conducting an MMR Analysis Using Computer Programs: Two Steps Output Interpretation Conclusions 4. Homogeneity of Error Variance Assumption What Is the Homogeneity of Error Variance Assumption? Two Distinct Assumptions: Homoscedasticity and Homogeneity of Error Variance Is It a Big Deal to Violate the Assumption? Violation of the Assumption in Published Research How to Check If the Homogeneity Assumption Is Violated What to Do When the Homogeneity of Error Variance Assumption Is Violated ALTMMR: Computer Program to Check Assumption Compliance and Compute Alternative Statistics If Needed Conclusions 5. MMR's Low-Power Problem Statistical Inferences and Power Controversy Over Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Factors Affecting the Power of All Inferential Tests Factors Affecting the Power of MMR Effect Sizes and Power in Published Research Implications of Small Observed Effect Sizes for Social Science Research Conclusions 6. Light at the End of the Tunnel: How to Solve the Low-Power Problem How to Minimize the Impact of Factors Affecting the Power of All Inferential Tests How to Minimize the Impact of Factors Affecting the Power of MMR Conclusions 7. Computing Statistical Power Usefulness of Computing Statistical Power Empirically Based Programs Theory-Based Program Relative Impact of the Factors Affecting Power Conclusions 8. Complex MMR Models MMR Analyses Including a Moderator Variable with More Than Two Levels Linear Interactions and Non-linear Effects: Friends or Foes? Testing and Interpreting Three-Way and Higher-Order Interaction Effects Conclusions 9. Further Issues in the Interpretation of Moderating Effects Is the Moderating Effect Practically Significant? The Signed Coefficient Rule for Interpreting Moderating Effects The Importance on Identifying Criterion and Predictor A Priori Conclusions 10. Summary and Conclusions Moderators and Social Science Theory and Practice Use of Moderated Multiple Regression Homogeneity of Error Variance Assumption Low Statistical Power and Proposed Remedies Complex MMR Models Assessing Practical Significance Conclusions Appendix A. Computation of Bartlett's (1937) \ital\M\ital Statistic Appendix B. Computation of James's (1951) \ital\J\ital Statistic Appendix C. Computation of Alexander's (Alexander & Govern, 1994) \ital\A\ital Statistic Appendix D. Computation of Modified \ital\f\ital\\superscript\2\superscript Appendix E. Theory-Based Power Approximation References Name Index Subject Index 1. What Is a Moderator Variable and Why Should We Care? Why Should We Study Moderator Variables? Distinction between Moderator and Mediator Variables Importance of A Priori Rationale in Investigating Moderating Effects Conclusions 2. Moderated Multiple Regression What Is MMR? Endorsement of MMR as an Appropriate Technique Pervasive Use of MMR in the Social Sciences: Literature Review Conclusions 3. Performing and Interpreting Moderated Multiple Regression Analysis Using Computer Programs Research Scenario Data Set Conducting an MMR Analysis Using Computer Programs: Two Steps Output Interpretation Conclusions 4. Homogeneity of Error Variance Assumption What Is the Homogeneity of Error Variance Assumption? Two Distinct Assumptions: Homoscedasticity and Homogeneity of Error Variance Is It a Big Deal to Violate the Assumption? Violation of the Assumption in Published Research How to Check If the Homogeneity Assumption Is Violated What to Do When the Homogeneity of Error Variance Assumption Is Violated ALTMMR: Computer Program to Check Assumption Compliance and Compute Alternative Statistics If Needed Conclusions 5. MMR's Low-Power Problem Statistical Inferences and Power Controversy Over Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Factors Affecting the Power of All Inferential Tests Factors Affecting the Power of MMR Effect Sizes and Power in Published Research Implications of Small Observed Effect Sizes for Social Science Research Conclusions 6. Light at the End of the Tunnel: How to Solve the Low-Power Problem How to Minimize the Impact of Factors Affecting the Power of All Inferential Tests How to Minimize the Impact of Factors Affecting the Power of MMR Conclusions 7. Computing Statistical Power Usefulness of Computing Statistical Power Empirically Based Programs Theory-Based Program Relative Impact of the Factors Affecting Power Conclusions 8. Complex MMR Models MMR Analyses Including a Moderator Variable with More Than Two Levels Linear Interactions and Non-linear Effects:

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.42-2852

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 554

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2005-01-01
Volume
42
Issue
05
Pages
42-2852-42-2852
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1612899892
Cited by
554
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regression analysis for categorical moderators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.42-2852
The paper
Regression analysis for categorical moderators. (2005). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-2852

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.