Cited by 873Ethics in Business and EducationJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorAcademic integrity and plagiarism

Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior.

Open access
Umphress, Elizabeth E., Bingham, John B., Mitchell, Marie S.·2010·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

We examined the relationship between organizational identification and unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB)-unethical behaviors conducted by employees to potentially benefit the organization. We predicted that organizational identification would be positively related to UPB and that positive reciprocity beliefs would moderate and strengthen this relationship. The results from 2 field studies support the interaction effect and show that individuals who strongly identify with their organization are more likely to engage in UPB when they hold strong positive reciprocity beliefs. Given the nature of reciprocity, our findings may suggest that highly identified employees who hold strong reciprocity beliefs may conduct UPB with an anticipation of a future reward from their organization. Theoretical and managerial implications of our results for understanding unethical behaviors are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0019214

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [8]8. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organi- zation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20 -39.
  2. [16]16. Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710 -725.
  3. [23]23. Dukerich, J. M., Kramer, R. M., & Parks, J. M. (1998). The dark side of organizational identification. In D. Whetten & P. Godfrey (Eds.), Iden- tity in organizations: Developing theory through conversations (pp. 245-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  4. [26]26. Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. (2002). Social exchanges in the workplace: A review of recent developments and future research directions in leader- member exchange theory. In L. Neider & C. Schriesheim (Eds.), Lead- ership (pp. 65-114). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  5. [27]27. Frank, R., Bryan-Low, C., Pacelle, M., Smith, R., Berman, D., Mollen- kamp, C., . . . Young, S. (2003, October 3). Scandal scorecard. The Wall Street Journal, p. B4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2010
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
769-780
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2062610052
Cited by
873
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 14
FWCI
28.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Brigham Young University
  • Texas A&M University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
Keywords
unethical pro-organizational behavior, organizational identification, moderating effect, employee unethical behavior, reciprocity
MeSH terms
Adult, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Personnel Loyalty, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Social Identification, Organizational Culture, Workplace, Ethics, Business, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review