The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Making political ecology
Abstract
Introduction: The Vitality and Promise of Political Ecology Originals and Development of Political Ecology Environment and Development Political Ecology of Nature Conservation Advances and Retreats in Biological Ecology Feminist Political Ecology Environment Politics New Questions, New Direction in Political Ecology Conclusion
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“El campo de la ecología política, que entre otros aspectos estudia los conflictos generados en torno a los recursos naturales, presenta elementos útiles para incluir en la historia a estas áreas marginales o de frontera, y a sus lógicas particulares (Leal, 2002;Offen, 2004;Neumann, 2005;Robbins, 2005).”
From Disputas por tagua y minas: recursos naturales y propiedad territorial en el pacífico colombiano, 1870-1930 (2008) · cites this paper as Neumann, 2005
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science–policy interface
Wesselink, A., Buchanan, K. S., Georgiadou, Y., & Turnhout, E. (2013) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.008 · Cited by 224
Leal, C. (2008) · Revista Colombiana de Antropología · doi:10.22380/2539472x.1063 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2005-10-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 43-1089a-43-1089a
- ISSN
- 0009-4978
- 1523-8253
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
