Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dangerous sanctuaries: refugee camps, civil war, and the dilemmas of humanitarian aid

·2005·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

1. Refugee Crises as Catalysts of Conflict 2. Political Incentives for the Spread of Civil War 3. Afghan Refugees: Three Decades of Political Violence 4. From Refugees to Regional War in Central Africa 5. Demilitarizing a Refugee Army: Bosnian Muslim Renegade Refugees 6. Collateral Damage: The Risks of Humanitarian Responses to Militarized Refugee CrisesNotes Index

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.43-1214

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2005-10-01
Volume
43
Issue
02
Pages
43-1214-43-1214
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1252921852
Cited by
286
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dangerous sanctuaries: refugee camps, civil war, and the dilemmas of humanitarian aid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-1214
The paper
Dangerous sanctuaries: refugee camps, civil war, and the dilemmas of humanitarian aid. (2005). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-1214

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.