The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Student success in college: creating conditions that matter
Abstract
offers a closer look into the U.S. system of higher education, seeking to answer the following question: What policies, programs, and practices promote student success? The authors embark on this journey examining a group of 20 four-year colleges and universities (e.g. schools included eight private and 12 public institutions representing 17 different states, with populations ranging from 682 to 23,063 students) that have fostered educational environments where engagement and success have transformed the experiences of enrolled students. For the purpose of this review, we organize our thoughts in the following two sections: Promoting Student Success The book thoroughly describes necessary conditions for student success and provides guidance for how institutions can create those environments. The authors reiterate throughout that the policies and programs described in the book are not unique to these institutions. What sets these 20 institutions apart is that when they design and implement policies and programs, they take serious consideration of their environment (e.g., campus location, setting, student demographics, traditions, history) and make sure that decisions taken align with the mission and vision of the institution. For example, the authors describe in detail how the University of Kansas begins stressing the importance of success to freshmen students during “Hawk Week. ” This weeklong schedule of activities at the beginning of the year teaches incoming students the traditions on campus, and encourages them to become part of those traditions, hence encouraging student success by creating a strong campus community. The authors argue that these schools work to offer opportunities that are tailored to their students, creating a meaningful learning experience centered on engaged and involved students. Among several examples, the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence
Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116 · Cited by 1,840
What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement
Kuh, G. D. (2009) · Journal of College Student Development · doi:10.1353/csd.0.0099 · Cited by 1,298
Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success
Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012) · Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge · doi:10.1145/2330601.2330666 · Cited by 987
Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences Can Make Scientific Research More Inclusive
Bangera, G., & Brownell, S. E. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-06-0099 · Cited by 722
“…Americans, and Na tive Americans made up 31% of the general population in 2010, but they represented only 18 and 7% of science, tech nology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) bachelor's and doctoral degrees, respectively, and 6% of STEM faculty members (National Science Foundation [NSF], 2013).”
BackgroundBovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4 · Cited by 685
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 43-1725-43-1725
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2980431835
- Cited by
- 1,604
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Student success in college: creating conditions that matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-1725
- The paper
- Student success in college: creating conditions that matter. (2005). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-1725
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.