Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study's participatory approach aligns with broader calls for more inclusive, responsive, and transparent innovation in educational assessment.
“This aligns with broader calls for more inclusive, responsive, and transparent innovation in educational assessment (Bovill et al., 2016; Healey & Healey, 2019).”
From Participatory Co-Design and Evaluation of a Novel Approach to Generative AI-Integrated Coursework Assessment in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Bovill et al., 2016
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017) · International Journal for Students as Partners · doi:10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119 · Cited by 626 · see citing works
Self-citationCo-creation in learning and teaching: the case for a whole-class approach in higher education
Bovill, C. (2020) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Self-citationFive propositions for genuine students as partners practice
Matthews, K. E. (2017) · International Journal for Students as Partners · doi:10.15173/ijsap.v1i2.3315 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Conceptions of students as partners
Matthews, K. E., Dwyer, A., Hine, L., & Turner, J. (2018) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0257-y · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Cultivating student–staff partnerships through research and practice.
Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2016) · International Journal for Academic Development · doi:10.1080/1360144x.2016.1124965 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationMercer-Mapstone, L., Islam, M., & Reid, T. (2021) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1655396 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Martin, A. F., Tubaltseva, S., Harrison, A., & Rubin, G. J. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15060808 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“This aligns with broader calls for more inclusive, responsive, and transparent innovation in educational assessment (Bovill et al., 2016; Healey & Healey, 2019).”
- Authors
- Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Elon University (US)
- Birmingham City University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bovill, C.
- Venue
- Higher Education
- Published
- 2015-05-14
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-208
- ISSN
- 0018-1560 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2111484615
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 155.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- BCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University) (acceptedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College (Bryn Mawr College) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- student-staff partnership, student engagement, institutional norms, inclusivity, transparency, university teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
