The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fair trade: market-driven ethical consumption
Abstract
Looking at the strategic future for Fair Trade, this work presents concise histories of different Fair Trade organizations, revealing case studies and useful data analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2008.31193458 · Cited by 4,567
Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social network
Brown, J., Broderick, A. J., & Lee, N. (2007) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20082 · Cited by 1,661
Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance
Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwr030 · Cited by 1,134
An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption
Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9 · Cited by 891
Purchase decision‐making in fair trade and the ethical purchase ‘gap’: ‘is there a fair trade twix?’
Nicholls, A., & Lee, N. (2006) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/09652540600956384 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 43-2905-43-2905
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1593329860
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fair trade: market-driven ethical consumption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-2905
- The paper
- Fair trade: market-driven ethical consumption. (2006). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-2905
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
