The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Populism and the mirror of democracy
Abstract
Populism raises awkward question about modern forms of democracy. It often represents the ugly face of the people. It is neither the highest form of democracy nor its enemy. It is, rather, a mirror in which democracy may contemplate itself, warts and all, in a discovery of itself and what it lacks. This definitive collection, edited by one of the world's pre-eminent authorities on populism, Francisco Panizza, combines theoretical essays with a number of specially commissioned case studies on populist politics in the US, Britain, Canada, eastern Europe, Palestine, Latin America and South Africa. A broadly shared understanding of the nature of populism gives the book a coherence rarely found in collective works and enhances the richness of the case studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108595841 · Cited by 2,986
Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style
Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12032 · Cited by 1,011
De Cleen, B., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2017) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083 · Cited by 571
Social media and populism: an elective affinity?
Gerbaudo, P. (2018) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443718772192 · Cited by 533
Castanho Silva, B., Vegetti, F., & Littvay, L. (2017) · Swiss Political Science Review · doi:10.1111/spsr.12270 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 43-3063-43-3063
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W567813143
- Cited by
- 1,147
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Populism and the mirror of democracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-3063
- The paper
- Populism and the mirror of democracy. (2006). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-3063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.