The DOI matches its Crossref record; 261 of the 261 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The authoritarian dynamic
Abstract
1. Introduction: the authoritarian dynamic 2. Kindred spirits, common spark: the theory of the authoritarian dynamic 3. Manipulating threat and reassurance: data and methods 4. The authoritarian dynamic and the politics of fear: putting the pieces of the puzzle together 5. Authoritarianism and conservatism across cultures 6. Authoritarianism and conservatism: how they differ and when it matters 7. One true people: putting a dace on the theory 8. One right way: fleshing out the portrait 9. Manning the barricades: racism and Intolerance under conditions of normative threat 10. The authoritarian dynamic: implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Kytle, J., & Bandura, A. (1978) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065952 · Cited by 25,422
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
(1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,085
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
Psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,626
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.
Willer, D., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073157 · Cited by 7,159
Cited by
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
The end of the end of ideology.
Jost, J. T. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.7.651 · Cited by 1,532
Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote
Mutz, D. C. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1718155115 · Cited by 1,236
Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition
HOPKINS, D. J. (2010) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055409990360 · Cited by 1,223
The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm
Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317698288 · Cited by 659
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 43-3680-43-3680
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W560152259
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 261
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The authoritarian dynamic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-3680
- The paper
- The authoritarian dynamic. (2006). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-3680
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
