The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Useless arithmetic: why environmental scientists can't predict the future
Abstract
This book is about disastrous decisions made on critical environmental issues. The authors document multiple cases ranging from nuclear waste disposal to plant invasion. Between the initial acceptance of a particular environmental issue and the eventual decision for action (or inaction), they show that something all too often goes very wrong. The cases they cite are unarguable, and they are right, at least about the outcome, in each instance: extremely bad decisions have been made that have led to situations that should outrage all of us. These have included the almost complete depletion of cod stocks on George’s Bank and the engineering of beaches that has had the reverse effect of what was purportedly intended, the saving of those beaches. Having been living recently in North Carolina, I am aware of the role of one of the authors, Orrin Pilkey, in combating beach development. He has stood up to the rampant and unthinking commercial exploitation of the coastline and exposed the obfuscation of developers and politicians as well as the miscalculations of coastal engineers. He is a hero of the environmental movement in North Carolina and deserves a hearing, even with a book having a title as provocative as this one.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Stage‐Based Population Model for Loggerhead Sea Turtles and Implications for Conservation
Crouse, D. T., Crowder, L. B., & Caswell, H. (1987) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939225 · Cited by 1,191
Lewison, R. L., Freeman, S. A., & Crowder, L. B. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00573.x · Cited by 495
Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions.
Stainforth, D. A., Allen, M. R., Tredger, E. R., & Smith, L. A. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2074 · Cited by 464
Cited by
Augusiak, J., Van den Brink, P. J., & Grimm, V. (2014) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.009 · Cited by 296
Seed exchange networks for agrobiodiversity conservation. A review
Pautasso, M., Aistara, G., Barnaud, A., Caillon, S., Clouvel, P., Coomes, O. T., Delêtre, M., Demeulenaere, E., De Santis, P., Döring, T., et al. (2013) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-012-0089-6 · Cited by 259
Food for Thought … Mechanistic Validation
Hartung, T. (2013) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.2013.2.119 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2007-08-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 44-6814-44-6814
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2755421633
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 3
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Useless arithmetic: why environmental scientists can't predict the future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.44-6814
- The paper
- Useless arithmetic: why environmental scientists can't predict the future. (2007). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-6814
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.