The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A biologist's guide to mathematical modeling in ecology and evolution
Abstract
Scientists perform experiments and gather data to gain evidence for or against various hypotheses about how the world works. This sounds straightforward, but exactly how we use this data to make quantitative statements about various hypotheses requires a bit more care. In fact, there are two related, but philosophically distinct, approaches to scientific inference. To some extent these two approaches parallel the frequency interpretation and the subjective interpretation of probability. “Classical” statistical analysis is most closely allied with the frequency interpretation, whereas “Bayesian” analysis is allied with the subjective interpretation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms
Rosenberg, N. A., & Nordborg, M. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg795 · Cited by 750
Cited by
Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals
Keeling, M. J., & Rohani, P. (2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4gk0 · Cited by 2,688
The macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: from development to deep time
Goswami, A., Smaers, J. B., Soligo, C., & Polly, P. D. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0254 · Cited by 359
Increased stem cell proliferation in atherosclerosis accelerates clonal hematopoiesis
Heyde, A., Rohde, D., McAlpine, C. S., Zhang, S., Hoyer, F. F., Gerold, J. M., Cheek, D., Iwamoto, Y., Schloss, M. J., Vandoorne, K., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.049 · Cited by 267
An experimental test of whether cheating is context dependent
Ghoul, M., West, S. A., Diggle, S. P., & Griffin, A. S. (2014) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.12319 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2007-08-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 44-6894-44-6894
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1571102089
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A biologist's guide to mathematical modeling in ecology and evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.44-6894
- The paper
- A biologist's guide to mathematical modeling in ecology and evolution. (2007). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-6894
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.