The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Restoring natural capital: science, business, and practice
Abstract
How can environmental degradation be stopped? How can it be reversed? And how can the damage already done be repaired? The authors of this volume argue that a two-pronged approach is needed: reducing demand for ecosystem goods and services and better management of them, coupled with an increase in supply through environmental restoration.Restoring Natural Capital brings together economists and ecologists, theoreticians, practitioners, policy makers, and scientists from the developed and developing worlds to consider the costs and benefits of repairing ecosystem goods and services in natural and socioecological systems. It examines the business and practice of restoring natural capital, and seeks to establish common ground between economists and ecologists with respect to the restoration of degraded ecosystems and landscapes and the still broader task of restoring natural capital. The book focuses on developing strategies that can achieve the best outcomes in the shortest amount of time as it: considers conceptual and theoretical issues from both an economic and ecological perspective examines specific strategies to foster the restoration of natural capital and offers a synthesis and a vision of the way forwardNineteen case studies from around the world illustrate challenges and achievements in setting targets, refining approaches to finding and implementing restoration projects, and using restoration of natural capital as an economic opportunity. Throughout, contributors make the case that the restoration of natural capital requires close collaboration among scientists from across disciplines as well as local people, and when successfully executed represents a practical, realistic, and essential tool for achieving lasting sustainable development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The dimensions of soil security
McBratney, A., Field, D. J., & Koch, A. (2014) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.013 · Cited by 867
An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation
Cowling, R. M., Egoh, B., Knight, A. T., O'Farrell, P. J., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Roux, D. J., Welz, A., & Wilhelm-Rechman, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706559105 · Cited by 649
Large-scale ecological restoration of high-diversity tropical forests in SE Brazil
Rodrigues, R. R., Gandolfi, S., Nave, A. G., Aronson, J., Barreto, T. E., Vidal, C. Y., & Brancalion, P. H. S. (2011) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.005 · Cited by 428
Intervention Ecology: Applying Ecological Science in the Twenty-first Century
Hobbs, R. J., Hallett, L. M., Ehrlich, P. R., & Mooney, H. A. (2011) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.6.6 · Cited by 417
Ecological restoration should be redefined for the twenty‐first century
Martin, D. M. (2017) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.12554 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2007-12-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 45-2023-45-2023
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2163186153
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restoring natural capital: science, business, and practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.45-2023
- The paper
- Restoring natural capital: science, business, and practice. (2007). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-2023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.