The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The great partition: the making of India and Pakistan
Abstract
partition of India in 1947 promised its people both political and religious freedom - through the liberation of India from British rule, and the creation of the Muslim state of Pakistan. In reality the geographical divide effected an even greater schism of the population, benefiting the few at the expense of the very many, exposing huge numbers of the population to desperate and devastating consequences. Thousands of women were raped, at least one million people were killed, and ten- to fifteen-times that number were forced to leave their homes as refugees. It was one of the first, the most bloody, and remains one of the most significant, events of decolonisation in the twentieth century. In The Great Partition, Yasmin Khan examines the context, execution and aftermath of partition, integrating an incisive knowledge of political manoeuvres with a deeply-felt understanding of their fundamental social and cultural consequences. She exposes the obliviousness of the small elite driving division, as well as the majority of activists on both sides, to what partition would entail in practice and its effects on the populace. Its repercussions still resound today. Published to coincide with the 60th anniversary of partition, Yasmin Khan's personal account draws together a fresh and considerable body of research, including many new interviews, newspaper extracts and archival sources, to reappraise independence and division and reinforce its catastrophic human cost. Intelligent, terrifying, wise and timely, The Great Partition is a testament to a country and people who were brutally and recklessly ripped apart.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanotechnology and its Applications in Medicine
Nikalje, A. P. (2015) · Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.4172/2161-0444.1000247 · Cited by 512
JHA, S., & WILKINSON, S. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305541200041x · Cited by 162
Muslim Belonging in Secular India: Negotiating Citizenship in Postcolonial Hyderabad
Sherman, T. C. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316154953 · Cited by 91
(2017) · Cited by 31
Displacement and development: Long term impacts of population transfer in India
Bharadwaj, P., & Ali Mirza, R. (2019) · Explorations in Economic History · doi:10.1016/j.eeh.2019.05.001 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2008-02-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 45-3347-45-3347
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1582698444
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The great partition: the making of India and Pakistan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.45-3347
- The paper
- The great partition: the making of India and Pakistan. (2008). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-3347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.