The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Empowering women in Russia: activism, aid, and NGOs
Abstract
Julie Hemment's engrossing study traces the development encounter through interactions between international foundations and Russian women's groups during a decade of national collapse. Prohibited from organizing independently under state socialism, women's groups became a focus of attention in the mid-1990s for foundations eager to promote participatory democracy. However, the version of civil society that has emerged (the 'third sector') is far from what Russian activists envisioned and what donor agencies promised. Drawing on ethnographic methods and Participatory Action Research, Hemment tells the story of her introduction to and growing collaboration with members of the group Zhenskii Svet (Women's Light) in the provincial city of Tver'.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beyond NGO‐ization?: Reflections from Latin America
Alvarez, S. E. (2009) · Development · doi:10.1057/dev.2009.23 · Cited by 375
Rivkin-Fish, M. (2010) · Slavic Review · doi:10.1017/s0037677900012201 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2008-02-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 45-3354-45-3354
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2014949544
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empowering women in Russia: activism, aid, and NGOs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.45-3354
- The paper
- Empowering women in Russia: activism, aid, and NGOs. (2008). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-3354
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.