The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Imprisoning communities: how mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse
Abstract
"While the effects of going to and returning home from prison are well documented, little attention has been paid to the impact of removal on neighborhoods where large numbers of individuals have been imprisoned. In the first detailed, empirical exploration of the effects of mass incarceration on poor places, Imprisoning Communities demonstrates that in high doses incarceration contributes to the very social problems it is intended to solve: it breaks up family and social networks; deprives siblings, spouses, and parents of emotional and financial support; and threatens the economic and political infrastructure of already struggling neighborhoods. Especially at risk are children who, research shows, are more likely to commit a crime if a father or brother has been to prison. Clear makes the counterintuitive point that when incarceration concentrates at high levels, crime rates in that place will go up. Removal, in other words, has exactly the opposite of its intended effect: it destabilizes the community, thus further reducing public safety." "Demonstrating that the current incarceration policy in urban America does more harm than good, from increasing crime to widening racial disparities and diminishing life chances for youths, Todd Clear argues that we cannot overcome the problem of mass incarceration concentrated in poor places without incorporating an idea of community justice into our failing correctional and criminal justice systems."--BOOK JACKET.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Territorial Stigmatization in Action
Wacquant, L., Slater, T., & Pereira, V. B. (2014) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a4606ge · Cited by 649
The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences
(2014) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/18613 · Cited by 599
Soss, J., & Weaver, V. (2017) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-060415-093825 · Cited by 591
Surveillance and System Avoidance: Criminal Justice Contact and Institutional Attachment
Brayne, S. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122414530398 · Cited by 538
Mapping the Shadow Carceral State: Toward an Institutionally Capacious Approach to Punishment
Beckett, K., & Murakawa, N. (2012) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480612442113 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2008-06-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 45-5872-45-5872
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1568285852
- Cited by
- 741
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imprisoning communities: how mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.45-5872
- The paper
- Imprisoning communities: how mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. (2008). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-5872
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.