Cited by 538Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime Patterns and Interventions

Surveillance and System Avoidance: Criminal Justice Contact and Institutional Attachment

Brayne, Sarah·2014·American Sociological Review

Abstract

The degree and scope of criminal justice surveillance increased dramatically in the United States over the past four decades. Recent qualitative research suggests the rise in surveillance may be met with a concomitant increase in efforts to evade it. To date, however, there has been no quantitative empirical test of this theory. In this article, I introduce the concept of “system avoidance,” whereby individuals who have had contact with the criminal justice system avoid surveilling institutions that keep formal records. Using data from Add Health ( n = 15,170) and the NLSY97 ( n = 8,894), I find that individuals who have been stopped by police, arrested, convicted, or incarcerated are less likely to interact with surveilling institutions, including medical, financial, labor market, and educational institutions, than their counterparts who have not had criminal justice contact. By contrast, individuals with criminal justice contact are no less likely to participate in civic or religious institutions. Because criminal justice contact is disproportionately distributed, this study suggests system avoidance is a potential mechanism through which the criminal justice system contributes to social stratification: it severs an already marginalized subpopulation from institutions that are pivotal to desistance from crime and their own integration into broader society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0003122414530398

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contact with the criminal legal system diminishes engagement with many institutions.

    “contact with the criminal legal system diminishes engagement with many institutions (Brayne 2014)”
  • Individuals who have had any type of contact with the carceral system, even those who have only been stopped but not charged for a crime, avoid surveilling institutions such as schools, banks, places of employment, and hospitals, even in cases where they require medical attention.

    “For example, individuals who have had any type of contact with the carceral system, even those who have only been stopped but not charged for a crime, avoid surveilling institutions such as schools, banks, places of employment, and hospitals, even in cases where they require medical attention (Brayne 2014).”

    From Catching Our Breath: Critical Race STS and the Carceral Imagination (2016) · cites this paper as Brayne 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brayne, S.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Brayne, Sarah
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2014-04-04
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
367-391
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W2129673993
Cited by
538
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 2
FWCI
79.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
criminal justice system contact, social stratification, desistance from crime, social integration, police stops, incarceration, arrests, citizen participation, religious participation, Add Health, National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review