Surveillance and System Avoidance: Criminal Justice Contact and Institutional Attachment
Abstract
The degree and scope of criminal justice surveillance increased dramatically in the United States over the past four decades. Recent qualitative research suggests the rise in surveillance may be met with a concomitant increase in efforts to evade it. To date, however, there has been no quantitative empirical test of this theory. In this article, I introduce the concept of “system avoidance,” whereby individuals who have had contact with the criminal justice system avoid surveilling institutions that keep formal records. Using data from Add Health ( n = 15,170) and the NLSY97 ( n = 8,894), I find that individuals who have been stopped by police, arrested, convicted, or incarcerated are less likely to interact with surveilling institutions, including medical, financial, labor market, and educational institutions, than their counterparts who have not had criminal justice contact. By contrast, individuals with criminal justice contact are no less likely to participate in civic or religious institutions. Because criminal justice contact is disproportionately distributed, this study suggests system avoidance is a potential mechanism through which the criminal justice system contributes to social stratification: it severs an already marginalized subpopulation from institutions that are pivotal to desistance from crime and their own integration into broader society.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Contact with the criminal legal system diminishes engagement with many institutions.
“contact with the criminal legal system diminishes engagement with many institutions (Brayne 2014)”
From The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System (2025) · cites this paper as Brayne 2014
Individuals who have had any type of contact with the carceral system, even those who have only been stopped but not charged for a crime, avoid surveilling institutions such as schools, banks, places of employment, and hospitals, even in cases where they require medical attention.
“For example, individuals who have had any type of contact with the carceral system, even those who have only been stopped but not charged for a crime, avoid surveilling institutions such as schools, banks, places of employment, and hospitals, even in cases where they require medical attention (Brayne 2014).”
From Catching Our Breath: Critical Race STS and the Carceral Imagination (2016) · cites this paper as Brayne 2014
Cites
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621794 · Cited by 10,127 · see citing works
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981 · see citing works
Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1080/00071310020015280 · Cited by 2,244 · see citing works
Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration
Pettit, B., & Western, B. (2004) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240406900201 · Cited by 1,499 · see citing works
Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action
Soss, J. (1999) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2585401 · Cited by 815 · see citing works
Incarceration and Stratification
Wakefield, S., & Uggen, C. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102551 · Cited by 747 · see citing works
On the Run: Wanted Men in a Philadelphia Ghetto
Goffman, A. (2009) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240907400301 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Drawing Blood from Stones: Legal Debt and Social Inequality in the Contemporary United States
Harris, A., Evans, H., & Beckett, K. (2010) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/651940 · Cited by 375 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Surveilling institutions highlighted in existing qualitative literature include hospitals, banks, schools, employment, and public assistance (Garland 2001; Gilliom 2001; Goffman 2009; Gustafson 2011; Harris et al. 2010, 2011; O’Brien 2008; Soss et al. 2011).”
BackgroundPunishment Beyond the Legal Offender
Comfort, M. (2007) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112829 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Holzer, H. J., Offner, P., & Sorensen, E. (2005) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.20092 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collateral Consequences of Punishment: A Critical Review and Path Forward
Kirk, D. S., & Wakefield, S. (2018) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092045 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Aggressive policing and the educational performance of minority youth
Legewie, J., & Fagan, J. (2019) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122419826020 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Catching Our Breath: Critical Race STS and the Carceral Imagination
Benjamin, R. (2016) · Engaging Science, Technology, and Society · doi:10.17351/ests2016.70 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Koester, S., Mueller, S. R., Raville, L., Langegger, S., & Binswanger, I. A. (2017) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.06.008 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Lageson, S., & Stewart, R. (2024) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12359 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The Effect of Multiple Types of Intimate Partner Violence on Maternal Criminal Justice Involvement
Gottlieb, A., & Mahabir, M. (2021) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260518820705 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
M. Vogl, T. (2020) · The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3396956.3396971 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Stuart, F., Riley, A., & Pourreza, H. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236625 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
No Justice, No Peace: Political Science Perspectives on the American Carceral State
Harris, A. P., Walker, H. L., & Eckhouse, L. (2020) · The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics · doi:10.1017/rep.2020.21 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System
Wakefield, S., & Turney, K. (2025) · RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences · doi:10.7758/rsf.2025.11.3.04 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brayne, S.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brayne, Sarah
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-04-04
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-391
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W2129673993
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 79.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- criminal justice system contact, social stratification, desistance from crime, social integration, police stops, incarceration, arrests, citizen participation, religious participation, Add Health, National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review